Compare Renault Clio IV vs Renault Clio V
Variants
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1448 mm / 57.0 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4062 mm / 159.9 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Track Width | Front
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2583 mm / 101.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
19%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.