Compare Citroen DS5 vs Toyota Prius 3
Variants
1.6 e-HDi AT
1.6 THP 155 AT
1.6 THP 200
2.0 BlueHDi 120
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
2.0 HDi 160 AT
2.0 HDi 165
2.0 Hybrid4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 1545 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
385 kg / 849 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 215/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4530 mm / 178.3 in
4460 mm / 175.6 in
Size | Width
1871 mm / 73.7 in
1745 mm / 68.7 in | 2030 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Weight
1370.0 kg / 3020.3 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2727 mm / 107.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.4 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.9 sec
CO2 Emission
89 ~ 92 g/km
Fuel Economy
3.9 L/100km / 60.3 MPG (combined) | 3.7 L/100km / 63.6 MPG (urban) | 3.9 L/100km / 60.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
142 Nm / 104.7 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm + 207 Nm / 152.7 lb-ft
Engine | Type
multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
e-CVT
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
29%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Lots of interior space
- Good front- and rear-quarter views
- Good transmissions
- Much improved styling
- Very low fuel consumption
- More space inside
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Hybrid nonsense
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.