HatchbackCitroen8% by Neofiliac Team67% by External Reviewers

Citroen C3 III

Subcompact Hatchback

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Citroen C3 IIIPhoto 1of Citroen C3 IIIPhoto 2of Citroen C3 IIIPhoto 3of Citroen C3 IIIPhoto 4of Citroen C3 III

Product Overview

Citroen C3 III is an affordable subcompact hatchback in production from 2016 to 2020, whereupon it received a facelift. It was available with a range of inline-3 and inline-4 engines that displaced 1.2 to 1.6 liters.
Compared to the Mk2 model, Citroen went all-out crazy with the "anti-theft ugliness" design philosophy, throwing black plastic on the original vehicle's buggy design. Unsurprisingly, even the French domestic market did not respond well to this much effort to uglify a vehicle.
The official fuel economy rating is exceptionally rosy, though it may cast more doubts on the trustworthiness of the regulators and perhaps the owner's own sanity than it relates to reality.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 8%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugliness in the black plastic flavor

What external reviewers found

External score 67%
Pros
  • Decent infotainment tech
  • Comfortable, roomy interior
  • Comfortable to drive
  • Punchy, punchy three-cylinder engine
Cons
  • Poor cabin ergonomics
  • Lack of legroom for a six-foot passenger

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
1.2 110 Euro6d
1.2 110
1.2 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 110 AT
1.2 68
1.2 68 Euro6d
1.2 82 Euro6d
1.2 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDi 99

Related Products

DS 3
DS 3 2016
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 18%
Nissan Micra / March 4 (K13)
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
· 4%
Peugeot 208 (A9)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 13%
Citroen C3 III facelift
  • Low fuel consumption
· 8%
Nissan Micra / March 5 (K14)
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 12%
Volkswagen Cross Polo 5
  • Low fuel consumption
· 6%
Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 7%
Renault Clio V
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 19%
Kia Rio / K2 III (UB) 3-door
  • Low official fuel consumption
· 22%
Kia Rio / K2 IV (YB)
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 25%
Volkswagen Polo 5 (6C) facelift
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Rather smart, sporty design
· 25%
Skoda Fabia 4
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
· 6%

External Reviews

carmagazine[1]

Reviewer score 66% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from carmagazine have found:
The new C3 is comfortable, engaging, roomy and economical. The styling is less divisive than the C4 Cactus, but still manages to stand out from the pack. The diesel option is overshadowed by the petrol engine. Citroen expects the diesel version will take just 25 percent of C3 sales.
Pros
  • Comfortable, roomy interior
  • Comfortable to drive
  • Decent infotainment tech
Cons
  • Poor cabin ergonomics

References

  1. ^ Citroen C3 BlueHDi 100 S&S Flair (2017) review. [carmagazine].

<

>

x