Compare Mazda 2 II vs Ford Fiesta 6
Variants
1.3 75
1.3 75 Euro5
1.3 84
1.3 86
1.4 CD
1.5 102
1.5 102 AT
1.5 103
1.5 103 AT
1.6 CD 90
1.6 CD 95
1.0 Duratec
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.25 60
1.25 82
1.4 71
1.4 71 AT
1.4 96
1.4 96 AT
1.5D 75
1.6 105
1.6 120
1.6D 75
1.6D 95
ST 1.6 EcoBoost
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 787 L / 27.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3- / 5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
Wheelbase
2490 mm / 98.0 in
2489 mm / 98.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.33
Towing Capacity
520 kg / 1146 lbs (w/o brakes) | 900 kg / 1984 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
17%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Decent reliability
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.