Compare Peugeot 207 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo
Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Dimensions
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
8%
25%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Beautiful design
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Unreliable transmissions
- No powerful engine options
- Very tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.