Compare Subaru Outback 5 vs Subaru Outback 2
Variants
2.0d
2.0d CVT
2.5 CVT
R3.6 CVT
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
459 L / 16.2 cu-ft ~ 1649 L / 58.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
469 kg / 1034 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Helical spring
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1545 mm / 60.8 in
Size | Length
4730 mm / 186.2 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 3
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Torque
223 Nm / 164.5 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2003
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
34%
Pros
- Interesting flat engines
- Decent offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Manual still available
- Some interesting flat-4 and flat-6 engines
- Subaru's signature symmetric AWD
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CVT in a crossover going offroad is a disaster waiting to happen
- Rather ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.