Compare Subaru Outback 2 vs Subaru Outback 6
Variants
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
2.5 182 CVT
2.5 188 CVT
2.4T
2.4T
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
459 L / 16.2 cu-ft ~ 1649 L / 58.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Double-wishbone
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1545 mm / 60.8 in
Size | Length
4730 mm / 186.2 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
169 g/km
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Torque
223 Nm / 164.5 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2003
Reviews
Neofiliac score
34%
54%
Pros
- Some interesting flat-4 and flat-6 engines
- Subaru's signature symmetric AWD
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good handlding characteristics
Cons
- Rather ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.