Compare Infiniti Q50 vs Infiniti Q50 facelift
Variants
2.0t
3.7
3.7 AWD
Hybrid
Hybrid AWD
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
74%
79%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Beautiful styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Great suspension setup
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Above average styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Cons
- Addicted to Hybrid
- Started engine downsizing
- Little improvement over pre-facelift
- Hybrid nonsense
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.