Compare Audi A6 C7 vs Audi A4 B6
Variants
2.0 TFSI quattro AT
2.0 TDI 136PS
2.0 TDI 136PS CVT
2.0 TDI 177PS
2.0 TDI 177PS CVT
2.0 TFSI 180PS
2.0 TFSI 180PS CVT
2.0 TFSI 211PS CVT
2.0 TFSI 211PS quattro AT
2.0 TFSI Hybrid
2.8 FSI
2.8 FSI CVT
2.8 FSI quattro DCT
3.0 BiTDI quattro AT
3.0 TDI 204PS
3.0 TDI 204PS CVT
3.0 TDI 204PS quattro DCT
3.0 TDI 245PS quattro DCT
3.0 TDI clean diesel quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI 300PS quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI 310PS quattro DCT
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp CVT
1.8T 150hp quattro
1.8T 163hp
1.8T 163hp CVT
1.8T 163hp quattro
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp CVT
1.8T 170hp quattro
1.8T 170hp quattro AT
1.8T 190hp
1.8T 190hp quattro
1.9 TDI 101hp
1.9 TDI 115hp
1.9 TDI 130hp
1.9 TDI 130hp CVT
1.9 TDI 130hp quattro
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 FSI 150hp
2.4
2.4 CVT
2.5 TDI 155hp
2.5 TDI 155hp CVT
2.5 TDI 163hp
2.5 TDI 163hp CVT
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro AT
3.0
3.0 CVT
3.0 quattro
3.0 quattro AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 720 L / 25.4 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Payload
550 kg / 1213 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.3 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
117 mm / 4.6 in
Size | Height
1468 mm / 57.8 in
1428 mm / 56.2 in
Size | Length
4915 mm / 193.5 in
4548 mm / 179.1 in
Size | Width
1874 mm / 73.8 in | 2086 mm / 82.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1772 mm / 69.8 in
Track Width | Front
1627.0 mm / 64.1 in
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
Wheelbase
2912 mm / 114.6 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
47%
Pros
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Interesting suparcharged V6 and 3.0 TDI engine options
- Up to 650Nm of torque
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
- CVT is widely used
- FSI engine unreliability issue still lingers
- CVT for FWD
- Unreliable automatic transmissions
- Still very front-heavy
- Some oil consumption issues
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.