Compare Kia Optima vs Kia Optima 2

Variants
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 136hp
2.0 136hp AT
2.0 149hp
2.0 149hp AT
2.5
2.5 AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 151hp
2.4 151hp AT
2.5 AT
2.7 AT
2.0
2.0 CRDi
2.7 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
496 L / 17.5 cu-ft ~ 816 L / 28.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4735 mm / 186.4 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
D4EA
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
20%
37%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • More modern design
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor safety rating
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.