Compare Mazda 6 GJ facelift vs Mazda 3 BK Sedan
Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.6
1.6 2006+
1.6 AT
1.6 AT 2006+
1.6D Euro3
1.6D Euro4
2.0
2.0 2006+
2.0D
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4870 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1840 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheelbase
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
35%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- GPF ruins many good petrol engines
- Stuck with MacPherson strut
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.