Compare Mazda 6 GG1 Sedan vs Mazda 3 BN Sedan
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 121hp
2.0D 136hp
2.3
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4680 mm / 184.3 in
4580 mm / 180.3 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
PY-VPS
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2005
Reviews
Neofiliac score
30%
35%
Pros
- Sporty yet elegant design
- Good towing capacity
- Good exterior and interior design
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.