Compare Chevrolet Malibu 8 vs Chevrolet Cruze Sedan
Variants
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.0T AT 2014
2.0T AT 2013
2.4 167 hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 182hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 196hp AT
2.5 197hp AT
1.6 113hp
1.6 113hp AT
1.6 124hp
1.7D
1.8 AT
1.8 AU/EU
1.8 NA
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Torsion
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1462 mm / 57.6 in
1477 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4865 mm / 191.5 in
Size | Width
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1788 mm / 70.4 in
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2738 mm / 107.8 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Engine | Redline
7000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
18%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Good fuel economy
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring handling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.