Compare Chevrolet Cruze Sedan vs Chevrolet Malibu 8
Variants
1.6 113hp
1.6 113hp AT
1.6 124hp
1.7D
1.8 AT
1.8 AU/EU
1.8 NA
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.0T AT 2014
2.0T AT 2013
2.4 167 hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 182hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 196hp AT
2.5 197hp AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1462 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4865 mm / 191.5 in
Size | Width
1788 mm / 70.4 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2738 mm / 107.8 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Engine | Redline
7000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
41%
Pros
- Good fuel economy
- Cheap to purchase
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Uninspiring handling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.