Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1370 L / 48.4 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring multi-link with stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Liftback Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1429 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4731 mm / 186.3 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
29%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
- Quite reliable
- Available with the famous Volvo T5
- Lots of room inside
- Good value for money
- Easy to work on
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- MacPherson strut front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.