Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S80
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.0T 163hp
2.0T 163hp AT
2.0T 180hp
2.0T 180hp AT
2.0T 226hp
2.0T 226hp AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4D 130hp
2.4D 163hp
2.4D 163hp AT
2.4T 200hp
2.5D 140hp
2.8T 272hp
2.9 196hp
2.9 200hp
2.9 204hp
2.9 204hp AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring multi-link with stabilizer
Helical spring
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
21%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
- Quite reliable
- Available with the famous Volvo T5
- Compact I6 engine for FWD
- Sweet I5 engine options
- Classy exterior design
- Great safety record
- Solid build quality
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Nothing exciting
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.