Compare Cadillac CTS III vs Ford Falcon
Variants
2.0T 6AT
2.0T 8AT
2.0T AWD 6AT
2.0T AWD 8AT
3.6L V6 (340 hp) AWD 8AT
3.6L V6 (340hp) 8AT
3.6L V6 8AT
3.6L V6 AWD 6AT
3.6T V6
CTS-V AT
2.0T AT
4.0
4.0 AT
4.0T
4.0T AT
XR8
XR8 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
535 L / 18.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
1494 mm / 58.8 in
Size | Length
4949 mm / 194.8 in
Size | Width
1833 mm / 72.2 in
1868 mm / 73.5 in
Wheelbase
2838 mm / 111.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.291
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2014 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
78%
Pros
- Wonderful exterior design
- Good handling characteristics
- Down to great 3.7s 0-100kph time
- Up to superb 322km/h top speed
- Up to awe-inspiring 649hp output
- Up to tremendous 855Nm of torque
- Up to enjoyable 7200rpm redline
- Good towing capacity
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Great range of V8 (supercharged!) and I6 lineup (forget the Ecoboost)
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- Manual transmission + SC V8
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Generic styling
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.