Compare Ford Expedition 4 vs Nissan Patrol 6 / Armada 2

Variants
4WD
RWD
5.6 317 AT
5.6 321 MT
5.6 321 AT
5.6 400 AT
5.6 400 Euro6d AT
5.6 405 AT
NISMO

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
547 L / 19.3 cu-ft ~ 2962 L / 104.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
88.0 L / 23.2 gal
Passengers
8

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
24.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
249 mm / 9.8 in
Size | Height
1940 mm / 76.4 in
Size | Length
5334 mm / 210.0 in
Size | Width
2029 mm / 79.9 in | 2372 mm / 93.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 2123 mm / 83.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1717.0 mm / 67.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1707.0 mm / 67.2 in
Wheelbase
3112 mm / 122.5 in
3075 mm / 121.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 3500 kg / 7716 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
98.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
5.6 L / 338.8 cu-in / 5552.0 cc
Engine | Power
375.0 hp / 279.6 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
107.3 hp/L / 1.8 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
637 Nm / 469.8 lb-ft @ 2250 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
10-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic SelectShift

Production

Availability
2017
Debut
2017 Chicago Auto Show
Made In
USA

Reviews

Neofiliac score
83%
87%
Pros
  • Wonderful interior quality
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • High reliability
Cons
  • Limited to V6
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Very high fuel consumption

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.