Compare Cadillac XT6 vs Mazda CX-9
Variants
AWD
FWD
3.5 AWD
3.7
3.7 2010+
3.7 2013+
3.7 AWD 2013+
3.7 AWD 2010+
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
356 L / 12.6 cu-ft ~ 2228 L / 78.7 cu-ft
487 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 2852 L / 100.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.4 L / 12.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
7
7
Payload
671 kg / 1479 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R20, 265/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
169 mm / 6.7 in
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1784 mm / 70.2 in
Size | Length
5050 mm / 198.8 in
Size | Width
1964 mm / 77.3 in
Track Width | Front
1686.0 mm / 66.4 in
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1682.0 mm / 66.2 in
Wheel Size
20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2863 mm / 112.7 in
2875 mm / 113.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.9 sec
Fuel Economy
11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (combined) | 13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 9.4 L/100km / 25.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
192.0 km/h / 119.3 mph
Towing Capacity
1814 kg / 3999 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine
LGX
Ford Durtec 35
Engine | Bore
95.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 222.7 cu-in / 3649.0 cc
Engine | Power
311.0 hp / 231.9 kW @ 6600 rpm
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
85.2 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
85.8 mm / 3.4 in
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
373 Nm / 275.1 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Final Drive
3.49
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
Debut
2019 North American International Auto Show
Made In
US: Tennessee; China: Shanghai
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
65%
Pros
- Great styling
- High cargo capacity
- Great interior comfort
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.