Compare Cadillac XT4 vs Mazda CX-9 II
Variants
AWD
FWD
AWD
FWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
637 L / 22.5 cu-ft ~ 1385 L / 48.9 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 2017 L / 71.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.4 L / 9.9 qt
9.9 L / 10.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Passengers
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/60 R18
255/60 R18, 255/50 R20
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
172 mm / 6.8 in
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1627 mm / 64.1 in
1716 mm / 67.6 in
Size | Length
4599 mm / 181.1 in
5065 mm / 199.4 in
Size | Width
1947 mm / 76.7 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1969 mm / 77.5 in | 2207 mm / 86.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1603.0 mm / 63.1 in
1656.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheel Size
18 in
8J x 18, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2779 mm / 109.4 in
2930 mm / 115.4 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
1587 kg
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
LSY
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Power
241.0 hp / 179.7 kW @ 5000 rpm
250.0 hp / 186.4 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
120.6 hp/L / 2.0 hp/cu-in
100.5 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 1500-4000 rpm
310 Nm / 228.6 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Final Drive
3.47
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
2016
Debut
2018 New York Auto Show
Made In
US: Kansas; China: Shanghai
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
37%
Pros
- Good styling
- Comfortable interior
- Good styling
- Rather good engine
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Poser crossover
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.