Compare Chevrolet Camaro 6 vs Ford Mustang 6 facelift
Variants
2.0
2.0 T MT
2.0 T
3.6 Euro6d MT
3.6 MT
3.6 Euro6d
3.6
6.2 MT
6.2
ZL1 MT
ZL1
ZL1 Euro6d MT
ZL1 Euro6d
2.3 EcoBoost
2.3 EcoBoost AT
BULLITT
GT 5.0
GT 5.0 AT
Mach 1
Mach 1 AT
Shelby GT350
Shelby GT350 R
Shelby GT500 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 255/40 R19 Rear wheel tires: 275/40 R19
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
87%
Pros
- Superb OVH V8s
- Athletic styling
- Good performance
- Decent handling
- Independent rear suspensions
- Supercharged V8
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Low build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not the best build quality
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.