Compare Chevrolet Camaro 6 vs Chrysler Crossfire
Variants
2.0
2.0 T MT
2.0 T
3.6 Euro6d MT
3.6 MT
3.6 Euro6d
3.6
6.2 MT
6.2
ZL1 MT
ZL1
ZL1 Euro6d MT
ZL1 Euro6d
3.2 MT
3.2 AT
SRT-6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
215 L / 7.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1296 mm / 51.0 in
Size | Length
4058 mm / 159.8 in
Track Width | Front
1493.0 mm / 58.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1502.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheelbase
2400 mm / 94.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Euro 4
Engine
M112 E32
Engine | Bore
89.9 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Displacement
3.2 L / 195.2 cu-in / 3199.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
79%
Pros
- Superb OVH V8s
- Athletic styling
- Iconic rear styling
- Reliable drivetrain
- Double-wishbone + multi-linke suspension setup
- Available with manual transmission
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Low build quality
- Perhaps too compact
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.