Compare Honda Pilot 3 vs Honda CR-V 2
Variants
FWD 6AT
FWD 9AT
AWD 6AT
AWD 9AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.4
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
74.0 L / 19.5 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
185 mm / 7.3 in
Size | Width
1996 mm / 78.6 in
Track Width | Front
1684.0 mm / 66.3 in
1533.0 mm / 60.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1684.0 mm / 66.3 in
1538.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheel Size
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2819 mm / 111.0 in
2620 mm / 103.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Power
280.0 hp / 208.8 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
80.7 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
27%
Pros
- Good engine reliability
- Some offroad capabilities
- Very high cargo capacity
- High cargo capacity
- Very reliable
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.