Compare Renault Twingo III facelift vs Renault Clio V
Variants
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2583 mm / 101.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Reviews
Neofiliac score
3%
19%
Pros
- Very small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Miserable electric range
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- The bus is much better
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.