Compare Acura ILX facelift 2 vs Acura 3.5RL
Variants
1995-2001
2001-2004
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
348 L / 12.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
505 kg / 1113 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
215/45 R17, 225/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1412 mm / 55.6 in
Size | Length
4628 mm / 182.2 in
Size | Width
1793 mm / 70.6 in
Track Width | Front
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1529.0 mm / 60.2 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
1404.0 kg / 3095.3 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17, 7.5J x 18
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2910 mm / 114.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.6 sec
Fuel Economy
8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (combined) | 9.8 L/100km / 24.0 MPG (urban) | 6.9 L/100km / 34.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
K24V7
C35A
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.6:1
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 143.7 cu-in / 2354.0 cc
Engine | Power
201.0 hp / 149.9 kW @ 6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
85.4 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
244 Nm / 180.0 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
14%
Pros
- New exterior styling
- Decent engine reliability
- Proven to be very reliable
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Generic styling
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.