Compare BMW Z3 M Roadster vs Audi TTS 8J Roadster
Variants
S50
S54
MT
DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
165 L / 5.8 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.8 L / 11.4 qt
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
2
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1350 mm / 53.1 in
Size | Length
4025 mm / 158.5 in
4198 mm / 165.3 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1422.0 mm / 56.0 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheel Size
17 in
9J x 18
Wheelbase
2468 mm / 97.2 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
16.6 L/100km / 14.2 MPG (urban) | 7.9 L/100km / 29.8 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
CDLB
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
137.1 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
91.0 mm / 3.6 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2500-5000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
66%
58%
Pros
- Good engines
- Simple to work on
- No BS driving experience
- Decent styling
- Decent performance
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very little cargo space
- Heavier than the MX-5 and handles worse (but much more expensive)
- Engine not special
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Only AWD
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.