Compare Chevrolet Corvette C6 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible
Variants
Z06
Z06 AT
L99 AT
LS3
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
144 L / 5.1 cu-ft ~ 295 L / 10.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.9 L / 12.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1246 mm / 49.1 in
1378 mm / 54.3 in
Size | Length
4435 mm / 174.6 in
4837 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1917 mm / 75.5 in
Track Width | Front
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Weight
1490.0 kg / 3284.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2686 mm / 105.7 in
2852 mm / 112.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.0 sec
Fuel Economy
12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
290.0 km/h / 180.2 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
LS2
Engine | Bore
101.6 mm / 4.0 in
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.9:1
Engine | Displacement
6.0 L / 364.1 cu-in / 5967.0 cc
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
405.0 hp / 302.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.9 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
543 Nm / 400.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
76%
Pros
- Superb engine lineup
- Great drivetrain reliability
- Good tunability
- Solid chassis design
- Great handling
- Athletic design
- Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
- Improved drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Low side and rear visibility
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.