Compare Alpina Roadster V8 vs Alpina B6 E64
Variants
B6
B6 S
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
73.0 L / 19.3 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
335 kg / 739 lbs
260 kg / 573 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/35 R20
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1320 mm / 52.0 in
1371 mm / 54.0 in
Size | Length
4400 mm / 173.2 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Weight
1615.0 kg / 3560.5 lbs
1930.0 kg / 4254.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.0 sec
Fuel Economy
9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (combined) | 15.0 L/100km / 15.7 MPG (urban) | 7.5 L/100km / 31.4 MPG (highway)
18.9 L/100km / 12.4 MPG (combined) | 22.6 L/100km / 10.4 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
260.0 km/h / 161.6 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
4.8 L / 295.2 cu-in / 4837.0 cc
4.4 L / 268.4 cu-in / 4398.0 cc
Engine | Power
381.0 hp / 284.1 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
78.8 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
82.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
520 Nm / 383.5 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
87%
Pros
- Superb styling (but not better than the Z8)
- Good handling (but not better than the Z8)
- Superb elegance and styling
- Good performance
- Decent handling
Cons
- A downgrade from the standard E52 Z8
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.