Compare Ford Mustang 5 Convertible vs Ford Thunderbird 11
Variants
Mustang
Mustang GT 304
Mustang GT 324
Mustang GT 324 AT
Mustang GT 500 507
Mustang GT 500 558
Mustang GT 500 672
2001
2002+
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
275 L / 9.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1323 mm / 52.1 in
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1829 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2723 mm / 107.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 241.0 cu-in / 3950.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
73%
66%
Pros
- Great V8 choices
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Improved sporty styling
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Good suspension setup
Cons
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Basic suspension setup
- Somewhat strange looking
- Does not handle well
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.