Compare Alfa Romeo Spider 939 vs Alfa Romeo 4C Spider
Variants
1.75 TBi
2.0 JTDM
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200
2.4 JTDM 200 Q-Tronic
2.4 JTDM 210
3.2 JTS
3.2 V6 Q4
3.2 V6 Q4 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
253 L / 8.9 cu-ft
110 L / 3.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.6 L / 11.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
2
Payload
350 kg / 772 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
MacPherson
Tire Size
205/45 R17, 235/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
113 mm / 4.4 in
Size | Height
1318 mm / 51.9 in
1183 mm / 46.6 in
Size | Length
4393 mm / 173.0 in
3989 mm / 157.0 in
Size | Width
1864 mm / 73.4 in
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
1639.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Weight
940.0 kg / 2072.3 lbs
Wheel Size
7.5 J x 17
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2528 mm / 99.5 in
2380 mm / 93.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.3 sec
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
CO2 Emission
161 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.341
Fuel Economy
6.9 L/100km / 34.1 MPG (combined) | 10.1 L/100km / 23.3 MPG (urban) | 5.1 L/100km / 46.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
257.0 km/h / 159.7 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc
Engine | Power
240.0 hp / 179.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
137.8 hp/L / 2.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic TCT
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
58%
76%
Pros
- Improved handling and comfort
- Improved top-down styling
- Improved performance
- Great handling characteristics
- Overall good styling
Cons
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Very little cargo space
- Concerns over reliability
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.