Compare Chevrolet Camaro 5 vs Chevrolet Camaro 6
Variants
LS/LT
LS/LT AT
SS L99
SS L99 AT
SS LS3
SS LS3 AT
2.0
2.0 T MT
2.0 T
3.6 Euro6d MT
3.6 MT
3.6 Euro6d
3.6
6.2 MT
6.2
ZL1 MT
ZL1
ZL1 Euro6d MT
ZL1 Euro6d
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
83%
Pros
- Superb suspension setup
- Great, reliable engines
- Good drivetrain options
- Great styling
- Superb OVH V8s
- Athletic styling
Cons
- Interior quality is average
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Low build quality
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.