Compare Alfa Romeo 4C vs Lotus Exige 1
Variants
Euro 5
Euro 6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
115 L / 4.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.6 L / 11.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
2
2
Payload
185 kg / 408 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/40 R17, 245/40 R17
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1183 mm / 46.6 in
1175 mm / 46.3 in
Size | Length
3989 mm / 157.0 in
3780 mm / 148.8 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1639.0 mm / 64.5 in
1454.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
1489.0 mm / 58.6 in
Weight
780.0 kg / 1719.6 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2380 mm / 93.7 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.5 sec
4.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.7 sec
CO2 Emission
157 g/km
Top Speed
258.0 km/h / 160.3 mph
219.0 km/h / 136.1 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.2:1
11.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc
1.8 L / 109.5 cu-in / 1795.0 cc
Engine | Power
179.0 hp / 133.5 kW @ 7800 rpm
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
99.7 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
89.3 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm
171 Nm / 126.1 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual
Production
Availability
2000 ~ 2001
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
77%
Pros
- Superbly balanced
- Good suspension setup
- Sweet little engine
- Much more affordable than the 8C
- Highly focused build
- Exceptionally light
- Very nimble handling
- Double-wishbone suspensions all around
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Very little cargo space
- Only available with a small engine
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.