Compare Cadillac XLR vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible
Variants
XLR
XLR-V
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
125 L / 4.4 cu-ft ~ 328 L / 11.6 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1279 mm / 50.4 in
Size | Length
4513 mm / 177.7 in
Size | Width
1836 mm / 72.3 in
Wheel Size
8J X 18
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
291 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
89%
80%
Pros
- Wonderful styling
- Hardtop convertible
- As well built as any modern Cadillac
- Rear-mounted transmission
- Decent performance
- Affordable way to get a big V8
- Sounds great
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Build quality concerns
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.