Compare Hyundai Tucson 2 vs Hyundai Nexo
Variants
2.4
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
728 L / 25.7 cu-ft ~ 1580 L / 55.8 cu-ft
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 1466 L / 51.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
451 kg / 994 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/60 R17, 245/45 R19
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door hydrogen fuel cell SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
Size | Height
1656 mm / 65.2 in
1630 mm / 64.2 in
Size | Length
4399 mm / 173.2 in
4670 mm / 183.9 in
Size | Width
1821 mm / 71.7 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Weight
1889.0 kg / 4164.5 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17, 7.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2639 mm / 103.9 in
2790 mm / 109.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.7 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
0.32
Top Speed
177.0 km/h / 110.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4KE
Engine | Bore
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 144.0 cu-in / 2359.0 cc
Engine | Power
176.0 hp / 131.2 kW @ 6000 rpm
163 hp / 121.5 kW
Engine | Specific Output
74.6 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
228 Nm / 168.2 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
hydrogen engine
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2013
2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
43%
Pros
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Powered by zero-emission hydrogen fuel cell
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Still ugly inside and out
- Poor performance
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.