Compare Hyundai Tucson 2 vs Hyundai Tucson 3

Variants
2.4
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 AT
0.95 kWh Fuel Cell
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDI 132 Euro6d
1.6 GDI 132
1.6 GDI 132 AT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d
1.6 T-GDI 177
1.6 T-GDI 177 AWD
1.6 T-GDI 177 AWD AT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d AWD
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d DCT
1.7 CRDI 116
1.7 CRDI 141 DCT
2.0 CRDI 136
2.0 CRDI 136 AWD
2.0 CRDI 136 AWD AT
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD AT
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD
2.0 CRDi 185 Euro6d AWD AT
2.0 GDI 164 AT
2.0 GDI 164 AWD AT
2.4 GDI 181 AT
2.4 GDI 181 AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
728 L / 25.7 cu-ft ~ 1580 L / 55.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
0.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1656 mm / 65.2 in
Size | Length
4399 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1821 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2639 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
0.35

Powertrain

Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4KE
Engine | Bore
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 144.0 cu-in / 2359.0 cc
Engine | Power
176.0 hp / 131.2 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
74.6 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
228 Nm / 168.2 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
36%
43%
Pros
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Still ugly inside and out
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Boring exterior design
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.