Compare Hyundai Veloster vs Hyundai i30 III
Variants
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi Eco
1.4 MPi
1.4 T-GDi
1.4 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 110
1.6 CRDi 110 DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 CRDi 95
N 2.0
N Performance 2.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
395 L / 13.9 cu-ft ~ 1301 L / 45.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Platform
Hyundai-Kia PB
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
149 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d - TEMP
Engine
THETA
Engine | Bore
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.4 mm / 3.4 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
48%
Pros
- Exceptional design
- Small turning circle
- Good manual transmission
- Low fuel consumption
- Good power output
- Interesting i30 N
- Fully independent suspensions
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Somewhat busy design
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.