Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo vs Skoda Fabia 3
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
1.0 60
1.0 75
1.0 60 2019+
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 2018+
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 110 DSG 2018+
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 2018+
1.0 TSI 95 DSG 2020+
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
330 L / 11.7 cu-ft ~ 1150 L / 40.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1467 mm / 57.8 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2470 mm / 97.2 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
14%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Beautiful design
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Very tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.