HatchbackVolkswagen7% by Neofiliac Team69% by External Reviewers

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift

Subcompact Hatchback

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii faceliftPhoto 1of Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii faceliftPhoto 2of Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii faceliftPhoto 3of Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii faceliftPhoto 4of Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii faceliftPhoto 5of Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift

Product Overview

Volkswagen Up! facelift is an entry-level subcompact hatchback in production from 2016. It is available with a range of inline-3 engines that displaced 1.0 liters.
Compared to the pre-facelift model, the facelift brought marginal updates. It has a basic mechanical setup and is not designed for high speed, long distance, or longevity.
The Volkswagen Up is limited to inline-3, which has horrible NVH performance and durability, a legacy of modern-day regulations.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 7%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup

What external reviewers found

External score 69%
Pros
  • Excellent standard equipment
  • Great value for money
  • Decent handling
  • Decent infotainment system
Cons
  • Lack of standard equipment
  • Pricey to buy
  • Struggles with stability control
  • Not the most fun to drive

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
1.0 60
1.0 60 ASG
1.0 75
1.0 75 ASG
1.0 75 Euro6d
1.0 EcoFuel 68
1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d
1.0 MPI 65
1.0 TSI 90
1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d
GTI
GTI Euro6d

Related Products

DS 3
DS 3 2016
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 18%
Nissan Micra / March 4 (K13)
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
· 4%
Peugeot 208 (A9)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 13%
Citroen C3 III facelift
  • Low fuel consumption
· 8%
Nissan Micra / March 5 (K14)
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 12%
Volkswagen Cross Polo 5
  • Low fuel consumption
· 6%
Renault Clio V
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 19%
Kia Rio / K2 III (UB) 3-door
  • Low official fuel consumption
· 22%
Kia Rio / K2 IV (YB)
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 25%
Volkswagen Polo 5 (6C) facelift
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Rather smart, sporty design
· 25%
Skoda Fabia 4
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
· 6%
SEAT Ibiza 5 (6F) facelift
  • Cheap to purchase
· 12%

External Reviews

autocar[1]

Reviewer score 63% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from autocar have found:
The car’s 1.0-litre turbo triple has lots of mid-range poke and a likable willingness to work. Being so short and light, the car changes direction very freely, although with a little bit of roll and only a medium-high grip level. A more typical hot supermini feels more adhesive and naturally agile, but the Up communicates its limits well and makes driving up to them more engrossing than many would think.
Pros
  • Looks and feels good
  • Lots of fun to drive
Cons
  • No automatic gearbox
  • Pricier than the original

autoexpress[2]

Reviewer score 68% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from autoexpress have found:
The Volkswagen up! is more sophisticated than its size and looks suggest. It's comfortable, feels stable on the road and is enjoyable to drive. Power comes from a 1.0-litre 3-cylinder petrol engine producing 64bhp. All cars get a five-speed manual gearbox as standard, except for the up! GTI.
Pros
  • Comfortable to drive
  • Decent fuel economy
Cons
  • Short gearing
  • Lack of standard equipment

References

  1. ^ Volkswagen Up GTI 2020 UK review. [autocar].
  2. ^ Volkswagen up! review. [autoexpress].

<

>

x