Compare Subaru Forester 3 vs Subaru Crosstrek
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 TD
2.0 X
2.0 X AT
2.5 XS
2.5 XT
2.5 XT AT
1.6 CVT
1.6 MT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.0DL
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
1270 L / 44.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Length
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2635 mm / 103.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
30%
33%
Pros
- Characteristic H4 engine
- Symmetric AWD
- Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Design downgrade from Mk2
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.