Compare Nissan Teana J32 vs Nissan Altima 9
Variants
2.5
3.5
2.0T
2.5 AWD
2.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft
436 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4850 mm / 190.9 in
4900 mm / 192.9 in
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1852 mm / 72.9 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2775 mm / 109.3 in
2824 mm / 111.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2013
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
24%
Pros
- Improved exterior styling
- Good interior appointments
- Decent styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with CVT
- No powerful engine options
- Not the highest grade of build
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.