Compare Chevrolet Malibu 8 vs Chevrolet Malibu 9
Variants
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.0T AT 2014
2.0T AT 2013
2.4 167 hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 182hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 196hp AT
2.5 197hp AT
1.5T
1.8 Hybrid EVT
2.0T
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.5 kWh (gross)
1.5 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Size | Height
1462 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4865 mm / 191.5 in
4923 mm / 193.8 in
Size | Width
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2738 mm / 107.8 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Redline
7000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
34%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Good exterior design
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring handling characteristics
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.