Compare Toyota Corolla 7 vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
1.5
1.6
1.6 CVT
1.8
1.8 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1435 mm
Size | Length
4640 mm
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Size | Width
1780 mm
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
1.2 - 2.0 L
Engine | Type
I3 or I4 petrol w/ or w/o hybrid
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual, CVT, hybrid (eCVT)
Automatic
Production
Debut
2018
Made In
Japan, China, Thailand, Taiwan, Turkey, USA, UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
7%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.4L/100km fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Not as good-looking as the hatchback
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.