Compare Nissan GT-R R35 vs Nissan 350Z
Variants
2008
2011
2013
2017
Nismo
Track Edition
283
300 AT
313
313 AT
300
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
235 L / 8.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.3 L / 11.9 qt
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Passengers
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
105 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1370 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Width
1895 mm / 74.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
VR38DETT
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.8 L / 231.8 cu-in / 3799.0 cc
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7100 rpm
Engine | Stroke
88.4 mm / 3.5 in
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT
Reviews
Neofiliac score
92%
65%
Pros
- Exceptional sprint time
- Great performance overall
- Superb handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7100rpm redline
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good drivetrain setup
- Good handling characteristics
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor interior finish
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.