Compare Chevrolet Camaro 6 vs Chevrolet Camaro 5 facelift
Variants
2.0
2.0 T MT
2.0 T
3.6 Euro6d MT
3.6 MT
3.6 Euro6d
3.6
6.2 MT
6.2
ZL1 MT
ZL1
ZL1 Euro6d MT
ZL1 Euro6d
SS
SS AT
Z/28
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2852 mm / 112.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
83%
Pros
- Superb OVH V8s
- Athletic styling
- Imcreased engine output
- Newer, more aggressive front-end design
- Good drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Low build quality
- Some fit and finish issues
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.