Compare Maserati MC20 vs Maserati GranTurismo
Variants
GranTurismo
GranTurismo MC Stradale
GranTurismo S
GranTurismo Sport
GranTurismo Sport AMT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
150 L / 5.3 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
370 kg / 816 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 380-390x34-36 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 350-360x27-28 mm
Ventilated discs
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 245/35 ZR20 Rear wheel tires: 305/30 ZR20
245/40 R19, 285/35 R19
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1221 mm / 48.1 in
Size | Length
4669 mm / 183.8 in
Size | Width
1965 mm / 77.4 in
Track Width | Front
1681.0 mm / 66.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1649.0 mm / 64.9 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 20 Rear wheel rims: 20
8.5J x 19, 10.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2942 mm / 115.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
2.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
2.8 sec
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.0 m / 108.2 ft
33.0 m / 108.2 ft
CO2 Emission
262 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Fuel Economy
11.6 L/100km / 20.3 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
325.0 km/h / 201.9 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 183.1 cu-in / 3000.0 cc
Engine | Power
630.0 hp / 469.8 kW @ 7500 rpm
Engine | Redline
7200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
210.0 hp/L / 3.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
730 Nm / 538.4 lb-ft @ 3000-5500 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
86%
93%
Pros
- Superb performance
- Sensuous styling
- Sweet V6 engine
- Sexy styling
- Superb engine characteristics
- Great handling
- Fine interior
Cons
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Very little cargo space
- Very high fuel consumption
- Some ergonomics issues
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.