Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Peugeot 2008 II vs Hyundai Kona facelift

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 AWD DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 DCT
2.0 MPI 147 AWD CVT
2.0 MPI 147 CVT
Electric
Electric Lite
Kona N

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
235/40R19
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
Subcompact crossover
Colors
Sonic Blue, Phantom Black Pearl, Atlas White, Cyber Grey Metallic, Dark Knight Grey Pearl, Ignite Red, Performance Blue

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1550 mm / 61.0 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4300 mm / 169.3 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2605 mm / 102.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
21%
29%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Up to 484km electric range
  • Interesting Kona N
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.