Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Honda Fit 4
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
1.3 AWD
1.3
1.5 e:HEV
1.5 e:HEV AWD
Crosstar 1.3 AWD
Crosstar 1.3 CVT
Crosstar 1.5 e:HEV
Crosstar 1.5 e:HEV AWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
4
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
17%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Still has I4 engines
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.