Compare Renault Twingo III facelift vs Renault Megane II

Variants
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
1.4 82
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 101
1.5 dCi 101 AT
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 82
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 113
1.6 113 AT
1.9 dCi 120
1.9 dCi 90
2.0 135
2.0 135 AT
2.0 Turbo 163
GT 1.9 dCi 110
GT 1.9 dCi 130
GT 1.9 dCi 130 AT
GT 2.0 dCi 150
RS 2.0 dCi 173
RS 2.0 Turbo 224

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
16%
Pros
  • Very small turning circle
  • Interesting engine options
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.