Compare Renault Twingo III facelift vs Renault Clio III
Variants
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
1.2 59
1.2 75
1.2 75 AT
1.2 78 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2i 101
1.2i 65
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 86 AT
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 88
2.0 138
2.0 138 AT
2.0 197
RS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.1 m / 121.7 ft
CO2 Emission
137 g/km
Towing Capacity
535 kg / 1179 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Reviews
Neofiliac score
3%
9%
Pros
- Very small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Miserable electric range
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- The bus is much better
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Unreliable transmissions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.