Compare Peugeot 208 II vs Renault Twingo III facelift
Variants
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Elastic beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4055 mm / 159.6 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in
Performance
Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Euro 6d-TEMP
Production
Availability
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
3%
Pros
- Improved styling
- Small turning circle
- Very small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible styling
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor build quality
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Miserable electric range
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- The bus is much better
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.